From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id aPU9FpF68WEyKAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:45:05 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4B7D01F3B6; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:45:05 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94C61EA69 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:45:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D63850400 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:45:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 765D63850400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1643215504; bh=XeAN0y57xCrJjab53gZTXsm3M1mB3jh2W8qGVxOrUko=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=fvu0R2+79UBspy6btvWoDGd9DkCvFsoeLh5DZCCLaiA/Dd5ms2fpTmZTXM6OXp2vW hX+aZgHLu94eJSm0b+wdFo5RVG3E6VlJ1IJgwIj/seUaLDseyaQOq7oZMqY7d5R7hD 6y8dxfP+iC/7fyPOP3toeAVLt8CCWN9kEbP2A+1M= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41BFF385E836 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:42:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 41BFF385E836 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-413-k6v5DEdoOkCgTZoNXFZzqg-1; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:42:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: k6v5DEdoOkCgTZoNXFZzqg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C2B100C663 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3762BE72; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:42:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GDB internal error by using text (instead of data) section offset References: <20220125230429.3329876-1-kevinb@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:42:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220125230429.3329876-1-kevinb@redhat.com> (Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:04:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87y232qwht.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Florian Weimer Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" * Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches: > So, what happens if there's no .text section? If that were to > occur, GDB would be in real trouble elsewhere since a search > for "text_section_offset" reveals 55 uses of this method, 27 > of which are in DWARF related code. The probes will always emit code, right? So there should be a text section. Thanks, Florian