From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29254 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 15:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29247 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 15:22:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2002 15:22:01 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0193.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.193] (may be forged)) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21709; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:21:56 -0600 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA25575; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:25:44 -0600 To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.c++/local.exp: add pr numbers References: <200204140640.g3E6etF27586@duracef.shout.net> <1018768341.21830.19.camel@dberlin.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: YUGGA-HUGGA-BUGGA-TUGGA!! HEY-HEY!! A TRAIN STATION!! No, a POST OFFICE!! An OCEAN LINER!! No, I think it's a CAFETERIA!!! Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Daniel Berlin's message of "14 Apr 2002 03:12:21 -0400" Message-ID: <87wuvacnev.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Dan" == Daniel Berlin writes: Dan> However, this *is* actually going to be annoying in the initial Dan> import, since it means that if they share the same bugzilla Dan> system (which only makes sense), i'll have to remap gdb's bug Dan> numbers to a new range (IE add 10000 to them. There are almost Dan> exactly 7000 gcc bug reports, and not going to be 3000 more Dan> before we switch) When we imported the libgcj Gnats database into the gcc database, we had to renumber. We just added a comment to every PR: "Previously PR libgcj/OLD-NUMBER". In the few situations where I've needed to look up a PR by its old number, this has let me do it easily. Tom