From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28928 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 14:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 28915 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 14:32:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:31:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3IEVexi027731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:31:40 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IEVbbu022461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:31:38 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [patch] Create cleanups.[ch] References: <4F8EC18D.2060203@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F8EC18D.2060203@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:28:45 +0800") Message-ID: <87wr5dqfg6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> On 04/16/2012 03:42 AM, Doug Evans wrote: >> Since cleanups are a big enough source of issues, I want to separate them out. >> This patch moves the core cleanup API into its own file. >> It makes no other changes. Yao> When hacking GDBserver, I am wondering if we plan to use cleanup in Yao> GDBserver? It is quite convenient if we use cleanup in GDBserver. IIRC Pedro said as much somewhere in the C++ thread. Tom