From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28013 invoked by alias); 8 May 2012 13:46:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 27988 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2012 13:46:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:46:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q48DkDup015374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 May 2012 09:46:13 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q48DkCqc007712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 May 2012 09:46:13 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: Abhijit Halder , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: GDB plugin References: <87vck7wxs7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 13:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Tue, 8 May 2012 14:38:02 +0800") Message-ID: <87wr4mvl97.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu writes: >> I think the api is not a big trouble, the Linux kernel's api is always >> change. But lkm is still alive. I use some ifdef to make KGTP can be >> work from 2.6.18 to upstream. I think if GDB can supply some >> interface to get the api version, support different api is not very >> hard. I'm skeptical, but I suppose as long as the rule is "if it breaks, too bad", then it is ok. Tom