From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10116 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2012 18:37:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10021 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2012 18:37:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:37:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5RIbNSc032406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:37:23 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5RIbMvY005740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:37:22 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml , Stan Shebs , Yao Qi , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH]Add option "-at" to "maint agent" and "maint agent-eval" References: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:59:08 +0800") Message-ID: <87wr2s61p9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00838.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu writes: >> 2012-06-24 Hui Zhu >> * ax-gdb.c (cli/cli-utils.h): New include. >> (linespec.h): Ditto. >> (agent_eval_command_one): New function. >> (agent_command_1): Ditto. >> (agent_command): Call function agent_command_1. >> (agent_eval_command): Ditto. >> (_initialize_ax_gdb): Change help for "maint agent" >> and "maint agent-eval". This is also ok. I think it may slightly abuse linespec parsing, but considering that it is a 'maint' command, I don't think it matters, as we are free to say "don't do that", or change it as needed. >> + expr = parse_exp_1 (&exp, block_for_pc (pc), 0); You'll need a minor tweak to get it to compile, since I changed parse_exp_1 today. Tom