From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26571 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2012 17:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 26493 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2012 17:44:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:44:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6RHi485007735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:44:05 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6RHi3C8006604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:44:04 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] attach to command_option-changed observer. References: <1343402543-665-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1343402543-665-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1343402543-665-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:22:19 +0800") Message-ID: <87wr1payl8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00703.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> This patch is to attach function 'mi_command_option_changed' to Yao> observer 'command_option_changed', so that a MI notification Yao> "=option-changed" is sent to MI frontend. If the command option Yao> change is requested from MI, the notification is suppressed. It occurs to me now that, when we had the naming discussion for the Python feature related to set/show, we ended up with the name "parameter" rather than "option" or "variable". Perhaps it would be best if MI adopted this same naming convention. Tom