From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4022 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2013 20:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4011 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2013 20:38:48 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_BJ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:38:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3NKcjbN026865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:38:46 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3NKci0s015707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:38:45 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Nicolas Blanc Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Test adding and removing a symbol file at runtime. References: <1366098721-18302-1-git-send-email-nicolas.blanc@intel.com> <1366098721-18302-4-git-send-email-nicolas.blanc@intel.com> <871ua1ouzr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <871ua1ouzr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:24:56 -0600") Message-ID: <87wqrtnfsb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00718.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> It seems simpler to do the test by using an ordinary .so and then Tom> calling remove-symbol-file on it. Then perhaps it could even work on Tom> some non-ELF systems. Would this not work for some reason? Ok, I see. Patch #1 enforces that the objfile must be OBJF_USERLOADED. Is this restriction needed? It seems to me that having remove-symbol-file work as a limited form of "nosharedlibraries" would be useful at times. Tom