From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22225 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2013 18:10:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22185 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2013 18:10:25 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:10:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r62IAIMJ002442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:10:22 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r62IAGZ7005583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:10:17 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Don't run SREC, IHEX and TEKHEX tests for MIPS N64. References: <51D1AD43.3060904@codesourcery.com> <8761wsgb8i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51D3050C.4070309@codesourcery.com> <51D30BB0.3050906@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51D30BB0.3050906@earthlink.net> (Stan Shebs's message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:19:44 -0700") Message-ID: <87wqp8estz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 >> It could be, if we can guarantee oddball architectures don't use >> pointers and addresses of strange sizes, say, an arch that declares >> function pointers of 4 bytes. Stan> You could test both a function address and a data address, and if either Stan> is greater than 4 bytes, the old formats can be excluded from testing. FWIW I'm actually ok with the original patch as well. So if Stan is happy with it, it is ok. Tom