From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17106 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 19:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17096 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2014 19:04:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:04:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CJ4LDr010417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:04:21 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-169.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.169]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CJ4KwP030117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:04:20 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v5] fix regressions with target-async References: <1394642546-10555-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <532096DD.2020201@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <532096DD.2020201@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:18:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87wqfzkzm4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> This is OK, please push it in. Thanks. Pedro> So in the end, after the target-async series, I think we should go Pedro> through non-MI tests and remove all that do "set target-async on". That approach is fine with me too. Then you can remove the odd linkage between the "maint" and target-async settings. Tom