From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88129 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2015 00:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 88120 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2015 00:07:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:07:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1O07rgq014702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:07:53 -0500 Received: from t540p (ovpn-116-86.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.86]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1O07pYl006885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:07:52 -0500 From: Petr Machata To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dwarf.exp: Allow generating a stub .debug_line section References: <87h9uc1y9o.fsf@redhat.com> <54EBB603.709@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <54EBB603.709@gmail.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:21:39 +0000") Message-ID: <87wq38yxwp.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00685.txt.bz2 Yao Qi writes: >> There were no regressions on x86_64. > > but the new macro you added isn't used by any test cases. Yep, that helps in not introducing regressions :) But you never know. > I'd like DW_AT_stmt_list implemented in the same way as other > attributes [...] Makes sense. I'll try to figure out how to put this together and get back to you later in the week. > Why don't you apply for an account for you? I applied now. Thank you, Petr