From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84541 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2015 19:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 84532 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2015 19:51:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:51:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F93898C3B; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-51.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.51]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7CJpJIo027996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:51:20 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Luis Machado Cc: Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] All-stop on top of non-stop References: <1432250354-2721-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <55C4E3BD.8040801@redhat.com> <20150812183208.GA24901@adacore.com> <55CBA0D1.5000203@codesourcery.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <55CBA0D1.5000203@codesourcery.com> (Luis Machado's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:38:57 -0300") Message-ID: <87wpx0b808.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, August 12 2015, Luis Machado wrote: > Alternatively, for such a trivial fix, shouldn't we go without a testcase? Not commenting on the other points, but I don't think we should. No matter how trivial is the fix, a testcase is always welcome. Of course, I do agree about your suggestion to document better what the testcase does. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/