From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29995 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2018 16:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29293 invoked by uid 89); 16 Aug 2018 16:45:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=ebb, EBB, franco, dscr X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:45:39 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7GGdnQ5111421 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:45:35 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kwa010nfn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:44:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:44:27 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.15) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:44:25 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7GGiOkL1573228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:44:24 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1817805F; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:44:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476BA7805E; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:44:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pedro.localdomain (unknown [9.18.235.43]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:44:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: by pedro.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B42563C03D7; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:44:21 -0300 (-03) From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com, edjunior@gmail.com, palves@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux In-Reply-To: <20180815000608.26840-1-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> References: <20180815000608.26840-1-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:46:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-cbid: 18081616-0036-0000-0000-00000A2405CE X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009555; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01074420; UDB=6.00553684; IPR=6.00854378; MB=3.00022759; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-16 16:44:27 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18081616-0037-0000-0000-0000489ADF7A Message-Id: <87wosqntwa.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 Pedro Franco de Carvalho writes: > These are all the changes compared to V2, following the suggestions > there, and following the changes to linux-tdep.c: > > * Adapted "Zero-initialize linux note sections" due to recent changes > from commit a616bb9450. > > * Added a comment to "Zero-initialize linux note sections" > > * Adapted all the four main patches that enable the registers > (PPR/DSCR, TAR, EBB/PMU and HTM) to account for the changes from > commit a616bb9450. > > * De-duplicated testcase names. Changed a few of the test names so > that they are environment-independent. Fixed a few other minor > issues with the testcases. > > * Changed one of the testcases for the HTM registers so that it > XFAILs. This testcase occasionally failed, possibly due to a kernel > bug. > > * Fixed some of the formatting and const-correctness in "[PowerPC] Add > support for HTM registers", in gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c. > > * Added an item in the NEWS file on the last commit, indicating all > the newly supported registers from this series. Considering Ulrich had already approved the V2 patches, do these changes need to be re-approved, or can they be considered as obvious, and can I commit them? I don't know if a NEWS item counts as obvious, but if not, I can submit it in a separate patch. Thanks! -- Pedro Franco de Carvalho