Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] Introduce thread-safe way to handle SIGSEGV

Tom Tromey
2019-06-09T15:43:10Z

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

>> + signal (sig, handle_sigsegv);

Pedro> Doesn't this lose the SA_ONSTACK?

Yeah. I'm glad you caught this since it points out that we have to call
sigaltstack per-thread.

Tom