Re: Problems with email delivery from sourceware?

Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2021-06-15T16:53:22Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:33:07 +0200
>
> On Jun 15 2021, Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote:
>
> > Is (or was?) something wrong with email delivery from sourceware? I'm
> > receiving only now some emails that were sent to the list 4 days ago.
>
> Any example?

I attach one such email below.

> > The headers clearly show that the email messages were stuck on
> > sourceware.org for all those 4 days.
>
> Are you sure they were stuck @sourceware.org, and not just delayed by
> the next hop?

I could be misinterpreting the headers, so please see for yourself.

Thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: mdelay --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 6179 bytes --]

From gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org Tue Jun 15 11:37:35 2021
Return-path: <gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org>
Envelope-to: eliz@gnu.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:37:35 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51778)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from <gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org>)
id 1ltB8B-0000As-Oc
for eliz@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:37:35 -0400
Received: from ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org ([8.43.85.97]:48510 helo=sourceware.org)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from <gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org>)
id 1ltB86-00053K-RV
for eliz@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:37:35 -0400
Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD6A3850424
for <eliz@gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:08:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3AD6A3850424
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
s=default; t=1623445700;
bh=bqagaYzNe7yfpxBnIioviIuHUp+IdkVzKG8KrBnq75M=;
h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
From;
b=dkIPrvk1t15MoU2EvtqF8KlTqDD4+CBG07JnaV7pTHoYdGMfflmLmXs02eA6XBDM3
G/kJ9u0Y8d9gvuBJNZUax/hKlLjRzcZ24ZLV7SIy3XmiEFKUB+592RF1h+kj9BiFd7
gK6wAYLxR85N0KWVLHyomXMo4IXvqv2sIbCCAnOU=
X-Original-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
(us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E88385501D
for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:07:53 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D1E88385501D
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
[209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
us-mta-508-3-XJ14BJOKiOtkR3axoq7w-1; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:07:50 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 3-XJ14BJOKiOtkR3axoq7w-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
[10.5.11.11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16351850600;
Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:07:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from f33-m1.lan (ovpn-113-207.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.207])
by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57A66064B;
Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:07:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:07:48 -0700
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mi-sym-info.exp: Increase timeout for
114-symbol-info-functions
Message-ID: <20210611140748.2b1e0146@f33-m1.lan>
In-Reply-To: <299cb515-c9ad-0b45-8885-c950fbdf0774@polymtl.ca>
References: <20210610172641.1052704-1-kevinb@redhat.com>
<20210610172641.1052704-5-kevinb@redhat.com>
<299cb515-c9ad-0b45-8885-c950fbdf0774@polymtl.ca>
Organization: Red Hat
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
<mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
<mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Reply-To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org
Sender: "Gdb-patches" <gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=8.43.85.97; envelope-from=gdb-patches-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@sourceware.org; helo=sourceware.org
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982,SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -D------

On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:11:31 -0400
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:

> On 2021-06-10 1:26 p.m., Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote:
> > Loading libc.so's symbols increased the amount of time needed for
> > 114-symbol-info-function to fetch symbols, causing a timeout during my
> > testing. I enclosed the entire block with a "with_timeout_factor 4",
> > which fixes the problem for me. (Using 2 also fixed it for me, but it
> > might not be enough when running this test on slower machines.)
> >
> > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * gdb.mi/mi-sym-info.exp (114-symbol-info-function test): Increase
> > timeout.
>
> This LGTM - as long as you can confirm that this is a case of "GDB
> thinking for a long time before outputting something",

Yes, confirmed.

> and not a case of
> "there's a lot of output and we are trying to chew too much in a single
> match". But it looks like the test is already written to consume little
> chunks at a time, since:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2d61316c32a9fa3e14786c3312d9ca87c9298db5
>

Agreed.

Kevin