Hi! On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:48:46 -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:49:50 +0100 > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > Anyway, the patch for sh-tdep that I posted in > > (at the end) > > also applies to sh64-tdep -- shall I commit the equivalent sh64-tdep > > change without any testsuite testing, or let it bit-rot some more? > With regard to sh64-tdep.c... Are you able to do any testing at all > to make sure that your patch basically works for sh64? If you're > able to get partial results with the other changes that you've made, > I think that's good enough. Even hand testing on something like > the gdb.base/break.exp test case would be okay. Not really, I'm afraid. > So... if you're able to test it at all so that you know it basically > works, then it can go in. If not, I'd prefer to have sh64-tdep.c left > in its current state until you are able to do some testing. OK. Is there any actual interest (other than ``nice to have'') in getting sh64 back into a functional state, given that its GDB port has very much been broken for several years already? Grüße, Thomas