From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31181 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2012 14:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 31173 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2012 14:53:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:53:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5PErSUC017287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:53:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5PErR9n016573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:53:27 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Cary Coutant , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Add global/static and symbol kind indicator to .gdb_index References: <20120619074931.6F0B41E136F@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <87txy3f7wr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87y5nfdpq7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:58:46 -0700") Message-ID: <87vcifcujc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00772.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> As a data point, using -fshort-double I created a program where gdb's Doug> behaviour with the index is different than its behaviour without it. Doug> [I can well believe there is more than one bug here though. :-)] I don't know if I would call them bugs exactly, but this is a part of gdb that is not very well specified. For example, you can change the result in your test case by changing the link order. Given this I don't think the behavior difference here between the index- and non-index-cases is really a bug. Tom