From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24724 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2012 17:28:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 24699 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2012 17:28:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:27:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7KHRYUR006284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:27:34 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7KHRXQ9030341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:27:34 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New warning in GDB 7.5 References: <838vdcdl2q.fsf@gnu.org> <20120818205543.GL2798@adacore.com> <837gsvewyh.fsf@gnu.org> <201208182149.q7ILnLb3017336@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <83393jegz3.fsf@gnu.org> <20120819043652.GN2798@adacore.com> <83vcgeddsm.fsf@gnu.org> <878vd9ip57.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <838vd9cylh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <838vd9cylh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:33:30 +0300") Message-ID: <87vcgdh3sq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00550.txt.bz2 Eli> If you say that it should work even without DWARF, I will try, when I Eli> have time. Thanks. Sorry, I know basically nothing about non-DWARF debuginfo. The general design of gdb is such that, IMO, it could work; but whether it actually does depends on the debuginfo reader. Tom