From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31288 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2012 15:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 31277 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2012 15:50:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:50:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQFoeTs016806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:50:40 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAQFocr3000981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:50:39 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Suppress repeated annotations until GDB is ready to accept input. References: <20121121201416.1015.36832.stgit@brno.lan> <20121121201429.1015.6037.stgit@brno.lan> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121121201429.1015.6037.stgit@brno.lan> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:14:29 +0000") Message-ID: <87vccsics1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Non-stop or async would complicate this, but no frontend will be Pedro> using annotations in those modes (one of goes of emacs switching Pedro> to MI was non-stop mode support, AFAIK). I've used these modes in Emacs (using M-x gud-gdb) before, and it has worked ok-enough. Can you say if these patches make it noticeably worse, or will it be pretty much like it was before? Tom