From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32420 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2012 16:27:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 32352 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2012 16:27:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:27:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBIGQwrL014576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:26:59 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBIGQuiW019838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:26:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA/OBVIOUS?] ui_file_new function missing "extern" in header. References: <20105.7837847204$1355819774@news.gmane.org> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20105.7837847204$1355819774@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:35:39 +0100") Message-ID: <87vcbzs4vj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00638.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> This is both a RFA Pierre> and a question about: Pierre> should this be considered as an obvious fix? Pierre> i.e. shouldn't all functions declared in headers Pierre> have the extern modifier? Pierre> Is this mandatory? It isn't mandatory right now, gdb does it both ways. I don't really care about this issue so I just tend to use whatever is used nearby. I think Joel at least has argued for making this part of the gdb style. Tom