From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9616 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2013 17:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9574 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2013 17:37:43 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:37:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2KHbacN012171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:37:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2KHbYlY018747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:37:35 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Yao Qi , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Don't use unportable macros References: <83ip4s4ixc.fsf@gnu.org> <1363407692-18959-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1363407692-18959-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <51492077.30307@codesourcery.com> <83sj3qyogk.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83sj3qyogk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:23:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87vc8m7z1d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:35:35 +0800 >> From: Yao Qi >> CC: gdb-patches , Eli Zaretskii >> >> Also define a macro 'mkdir' in this patch, as Eli suggested before. Is >> it OK? Eli> The macro is OK, but please make sure unistd.h is included by this Eli> file, because that's where MinGW defines the prototype of _mkdir. defs.h includes unistd.h. Tom