From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30705 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2013 14:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30650 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2013 14:19:31 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:19:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3PEESPG001579 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:14:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3PEER0R024444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:14:27 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Blanc\, Nicolas" Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Added command remove-symbol-file. References: <1366098721-18302-1-git-send-email-nicolas.blanc@intel.com> <1366098721-18302-2-git-send-email-nicolas.blanc@intel.com> <87fvygnfl0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <388084C8C1E6A64FA36AD1D656E4856619DEF314@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <388084C8C1E6A64FA36AD1D656E4856619DEF314@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (Nicolas Blanc's message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:48:56 +0000") Message-ID: <87vc7aitod.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2 Tom> I liked Yao's comment about notifying just once per breakpoint. Tom> It doesn't seem difficult to do that. Nicolas> Ok I'll use a list of breakpoints to collect first the Nicolas> breakpoints to notify. I think another way is to loop over all breakpoints and then examine their locations. That way you don't have to keep a separate list of breakpoints to notify -- you can just decide about the current breakpoint after the inner loop. Tom