From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6099 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 21:41:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6086 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2014 21:41:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:41:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FLfOic031237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:41:24 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FLfMRi005384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:41:23 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Sanimir Agovic Cc: palves@redhat.com, xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, keven.boell@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] C99 variable length array support References: <1387282678-3847-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1387282678-3847-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com> (Sanimir Agovic's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:17:45 +0100") Message-ID: <87vbxkorct.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sanimir" == Sanimir Agovic writes: Sanimir> this patch series (v3) add C99 variable length support to gdb. Thanks. I went through the series again and sent my notes. I think the ones I did not reply to this time were ok according to my reviews of v2, though I found it a little hard to keep track this time. Tom