Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gdb: make macro_expand_next return a gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:53:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9j88edi.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200628165628.96730-3-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches's message of "Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:56:27 -0400")

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Simon> I removed the ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT on macro_buffer::release, I don't
Simon> really understand why it's there.  I don't see how this method could be
Simon> called without using the result, that would be an obvious memory leak.
Simon> The commit that introduced it (4e4a8b932b7 "Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT
Simon> to macro_buffer") doesn't give any details.

Sorry about the lack of details!

Simon> -  /* Release the text of the buffer to the caller, which is now
Simon> -     responsible for freeing it.  */
Simon> -  ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT char *release ()
Simon> +  /* Release the text of the buffer to the caller.  */
Simon> +  gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> release ()

In the old code, the caller had to remember to free the resulting char*.
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT meant that one couldn't write "x.release();"
without at least doing something with the result.

There was at least one case of this happening, though I didn't read
through the thread to find out exactly where it was:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-February/155835.html

Using a unique pointer eliminates this common source of bugs, so I think
removing the attribute makes sense.

This patch looks fine to me.

Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-28 16:56 [PATCH 0/3] Small cleanups in macro code Simon Marchi
2020-06-28 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] gdb: remove callback in macro expand functions Simon Marchi
2020-06-30 20:47   ` Tom Tromey
2020-06-30 22:14     ` Matt Rice
2020-06-30 22:26       ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-28 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] gdb: make macro_expand_next return a gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> Simon Marchi
2020-06-30 20:53   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2020-06-30 22:26     ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-28 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] gdb: make macro_stringify " Simon Marchi
2020-06-30 20:55   ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-01  0:26     ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-01 15:36       ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-04  2:28         ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9j88edi.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox