From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id eN/NEZMZ+WjvLwMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:51:15 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=eYB4xp7w; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3A5E41E0BC; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:51:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B5B1E04C for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:51:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832D53858428 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:51:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 832D53858428 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=eYB4xp7w Received: from omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.39]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76C23858C30 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:50:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A76C23858C30 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org A76C23858C30 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.39 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1761155442; cv=none; b=RS6qH7WsVUNC6t+mAp7VYpSmvwSb9usvlCrfZHbLL/8A39Cf/VYjHykz3roo5Kfz5gil51yWYRYUaqg0TZymjbJl6tVyADYT2/g4gXvxA1rj/vEYyRtrZxVq/8v/6foTphI91L7Uw1alg/1JUvNFDl4L5ieGRca2zTZmoqy//QM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1761155442; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wpWYfPPSByBXaLmy8ThaV1x2E55ANDtUUfi1VbZA/GM=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=X4/tHq/Ctbu/TWC1uTsaluS6qCz3y94nfuMG9TtYrf05aRC+lnrsrYJsCDmngMZ0snEHpFxxIs1UZmre7MMCGddEOLstWB/w7mMTOfyWi+l27qQPPqq4pcvPqdfHFxq93TCgRzyyiYeCZ/EOKEBVJMuSSGsEv4Zr2/RpFeHCXO0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A76C23858C30 Received: from eig-obgw-5002b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.226]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id BZy3vnYauv724BcywvlEZE; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:50:42 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id BcyvvUJkMniktBcyvvFnvX; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:50:42 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=FOIbx/os c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68f91972 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=aSHmqdeZAXURSQzp:21 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=0hWKhSkiEWV2nBmNgGkA:9 a=VS4QxaUSPT0UtbFnIvSC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wpWYfPPSByBXaLmy8ThaV1x2E55ANDtUUfi1VbZA/GM=; b=eYB4xp7wMo+nOpp9W7vSzjcgRv JeaKA4sORZ4wG31zXwts8anjAnj04sjqX+kk1WH6jaRNWKa4EQfP1zvBaqOs8YxMQ5Zjt7yng4QcK Gs4YQfntY9dEvU80zu5c2mZX9; Received: from 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.110.68]:52308 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vBcyv-00000001JYH-0uSd; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:50:41 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Sahil Siddiq Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Sahil Siddiq Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: fix "frame function" failure to get frame when call is it's last instruction In-Reply-To: <20240704163348.67304-1-sahilcdq@proton.me> (Sahil Siddiq's message of "Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:03:48 +0530") References: <20240704163348.67304-1-sahilcdq@proton.me> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:50:39 -0600 Message-ID: <87v7k6keq8.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.110.68 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1vBcyv-00000001JYH-0uSd X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [97.122.110.68]:52308 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 6 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfI6QE24pf089+awpzOv4DCmInvtFJS5lalPGKwAHp5VupIKoGzGeqzhWvhejxExOmRQuaIWA5WzLjR8YQ0r4dMuRPJhVZvZtiw1tIEuiVJewIjKgGypc YSoBp+cGZsHVTqzjxhzYJ1/GFTv8jKI80wFPwgj3oJb5lLNi2a54/jJmlwh98lWG1uBPfXHm7ntLqf4B2vozzLUSLIG3iDfPQuo= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> Sahil Siddiq writes: > "frame function" currently fails to retrieve the frame > associated with a function when the last instruction > in the frame is a call. This is because the instruction > pointer points to an address that lies outside the frame. > Using "get_frame_address_in_block" instead of "get_frame_pc" > resolves this issue. I ran across this patch... whatever happened here? Did you get a copyright assignment sorted out? thanks, Tom