From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18569 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 14:54:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 18554 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 14:54:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:54:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KEruCb026153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KErslI021077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:53:55 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move VEC (const_char_ptr) to gdb_vecs.h References: <4F9106E8.8040208@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F9106E8.8040208@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:49:12 +0800") Message-ID: <87ty0ejvy5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> On 04/20/2012 12:23 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> This patch moves the definition of VEC (const_char_ptr) to gdb_vecs.h. >> It is rather obvious, but I decided to ask either way. Ok to apply? Yao> It is right to me, but I am not the people to approve it. IIRC, Yao> gdb_vecs.h is created to put several DEF_VEC_P in it. Yeah. The patch is ok. Tom