From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30458 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2012 18:17:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 30432 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2012 18:17:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:17:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q56IGqh9012126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:16:52 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q56IGomH021400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:16:51 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: oza Pawandeep Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [design change] record-replay linux ABI level References: <87sjf9qecr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87aa1gqhnq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120514145650.GF10253@adacore.com> <87havhtmzy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <874nrgrx70.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (oza Pawandeep's message of "Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:46:15 +0530") Message-ID: <87txyogval.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.97 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Oza" == oza Pawandeep writes: Oza> 1) use the above file for recording purpose too and define new Oza> arm-linux.xml for arm specific syscalls. Oza> 2) or we decide to keep only one combined xml files for record-replay Oza> future for all arch. I think separate files is best. If there is substantial commonality, we can do inclusions, the way that is done in some features/*.xml files. E.g, from features/arm-with-m.xml: Tom