From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2012 15:40:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 18212 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2012 15:40:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:40:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5CFeAId022273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:40:10 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5CFe9F2016179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:40:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: fix latent bug in dw2_find_symbol_file References: <87d3558zcz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87txyh7ejn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:08:05 -0700") Message-ID: <87txyg5yjq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> What I'm saying is the patch is wrong for TUs but TUs are irrelevant Doug> here anyway. Doug> What did you want to test? A fix, plus the other changes I am planning. Tom