From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16467 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2013 16:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16453 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2013 16:01:08 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:01:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3MG16IN017094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:01:06 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3MG15KZ021386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:01:05 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dprintf can be saved References: <87fvymwkbi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:37:24 +0800") Message-ID: <87txmysgfy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: Hui> 2013-04-20 Hui Zhu Hui> PR gdb/15165 Hui> * gdb.base/save-bp.exp: Add test for dprintf. This is ok. FWIW I think it is best to merge the bug fix with the test case and commit them as a single patch. Tom