From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7214 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2013 14:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7187 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jul 2013 14:23:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:23:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6QENJfF011119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:23:19 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6QENI78025907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:23:19 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gp \>\> \"gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml\"" Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix mi-var-child-f.exp failures References: <51F1BB9A.6050607@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51F1BB9A.6050607@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:58:18 -0700") Message-ID: <87txjhtn6x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> 2013-07-25 Keith Seitz Keith> * gdb.mi/mi-var-child-f.exp: Use mi_create_varobj. Keith> Use mi_list_varobj_children for the immediate children of `array'. Keith> Add "has_more" attribute for grandchildren test. This is ok. Thanks. On irc you said this happens if you don't have f77 installed. Is there a way to make the test also work with gfortran? I think f77 is mostly dead. Tom