From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13194 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2013 16:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13183 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2013 16:52:11 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:52:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r75Gq1jG012602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:52:02 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r75Gq0TV014362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:52:01 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: RFC: don't call add_target for thread_db_ops References: <1372783053-14925-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <51D3E4CB.3060801@redhat.com> <87ehamwwtq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51F13898.2050700@redhat.com> <87ppu6vbxx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51F1581D.4080008@redhat.com> <87li4uv6nh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87li4uv6nh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:25:22 -0600") Message-ID: <87txj484i8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This removes a few more erroneous calls to add_target. These calls Tom> end up installing the target in a user-visible way; but these targets Tom> are all auto-activated and, I think, should never be explicitly Tom> requested. Tom> I have no way to test these. I'm checking this in. If it causes some problem, please let me know and I will try to fix it up. I don't anticipate anything though. Tom