From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18969 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2013 19:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18957 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2013 19:19:37 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:19:37 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8KJJXJO017062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:19:33 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8KJJWEV027100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:19:32 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Yao Qi , Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] Test on solib load and unload References: <520B7F70.6070207@codesourcery.com> <1377663394-4975-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1377663394-4975-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <521D7BCA.10806@codesourcery.com> <21051.32359.845429.92304@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <21051.32359.845429.92304@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:44:55 -0700") Message-ID: <87txhfpagr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2 Doug> I like tests that leave things behind afterwards so that if I want to Doug> run things by hand afterwards I can easily do so. Yes, that's definitely good. Doug> Let "make clean" clean up build artifacts. Doug> [Our testsuite "make clean" rules are always lagging behind, but with some Doug> conventions in the perf testsuite we can make this a tractable problem. I really dislike the "make clean" rules, mostly because they mean maintaining a huge number of Makefiles just for this one purpose. In GDB_PARALLEL mode, "make clean" works by zapping a few directories... much nicer :-). On my branch I removed all those Makefiles too. I'm curious whether I ought to try to upstream this. Tom