From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 0AYZKVMfoGVmyzgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:03:15 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=S1zOczo9; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A4E791E0C2; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:03:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90FAB1E098 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:03:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011833857000 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:03:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta36.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta36.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.89.44.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C4F3858C41 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:02:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E6C4F3858C41 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E6C4F3858C41 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=35.89.44.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704992576; cv=none; b=RF9LOQ6v1o7guoHe5kuH6A3APh5DEYfodACrlURmX+FI0AqJbqoTH0LmU/J9JirDmJGbGxu+woObc4dnwPTs5ClkmmG9cjOWaAlw/k3pujYkRcYUzKGVHN8XY2rB7n54fIpbZjPtBoGcFX+VN74b2dt0mFiQ8QIAlr+kULKgSU8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704992576; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZPjJF0TBuN3LaAXAphd4+UXK9mhPjp+uV7sYqAcCTmo=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=HBNa7FGqbMWWXkmIbKLjbwvwne14axA9t7HLM42P4NsDagqG/MHa9Z8wqbHS5JNCG+gxwBQrkl/V0u5qqzZ1iG19SrKFgz/eaOUgi2coz7tkwpsomJHENX3IyJ4U4Zcmy/p5VcwXvLy0K6mp4RQstr+bgOuHUt0Kcb8YgLoDto8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-5004a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.221]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id NyPdrbAkFCF6GNySCromgI; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:02:53 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id NySBrhTL0KleDNySBrKBlp; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:02:52 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=KcbBDCUD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65a01f3c a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=OWjo9vPv0XrRhIrVQ50Ab3nP57M=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=dEuoMetlWLkA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=dtXTu-jlnmva_NiwPjkA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZPjJF0TBuN3LaAXAphd4+UXK9mhPjp+uV7sYqAcCTmo=; b=S1zOczo9TQaWqkzjIdV1B3372u Z7FGz0OnR6xB1uPhguW6U1lZJkW8ozBNai0XgTtXObGp1dz5Y27Wkor7MZbgFN/3vxPdUxN+KbarT x6aJKgN/KIMI5siHITOz9Fhpx; Received: from 97-122-68-157.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.68.157]:42428 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNySB-003rdF-0E; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:02:51 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom Tromey Cc: Guinevere Larsen , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/dwarf2: Add support for DW_LNS_set_epilogue_begin in line-table References: <20231221102925.377720-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <3cf538c1-c8a9-404f-a2d2-86fd3d39fb5b@simark.ca> <6cfe89c3-cff0-4d56-bc96-7d8b358246fb@redhat.com> <87r0iprrx3.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:02:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87r0iprrx3.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:59:04 -0700") Message-ID: <87ttnjrefa.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.68.157 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rNySB-003rdF-0E X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-68-157.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [97.122.68.157]:42428 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 3 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfG0yICFzVpOKW18euBQ7iWiHkO0FLtxTnvT+H225zFRkVFrajqt21IiL9gCQ/yP6E5HamKlsJT3cmCPwZHxOIwCmx+diTs542Z8BpGcaJxWGPx4hNGCf qBeB++D2VETxPdTlI0MMQ5CBC4NPTPZJwfNoKqunBqoQ5NWAjE+FqbGvF7+Km11m5oOb/oK2VObmoiAjri4QMIwMSn+2wyCRtBY= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3016.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Guinevere> I don't see anything wrong with this test locally, I get 179 expected Guinevere> passes. Could it be some difference in config? Tom> FWIW it works for me on x86-64 Fedora 38, using the system gcc. Tom> I was wondering if there could be a compiler difference but I see the Tom> test uses a .s file, so maybe not. I found out today that it fails in my ASAN build but not my regular build. I didn't see any ASAN warnings in the log, though. Tom