From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1433 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 12:03:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1414 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 12:03:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:02:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HC2gOW031420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:02:42 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3HC2fI9001793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:02:41 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix in-src-tree builds by making gdbserver/gnulib/ a separate library (a la libiberty, etc.), and adding ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR. References: <1334127046-27627-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <20120413212559.GA5867@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F88F188.1050401@codesourcery.com> <20120415164917.GA2861@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8BFB25.5030808@redhat.com> <4F8C5794.5050302@redhat.com> <87vckzzbss.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8C82A6.5000104@redhat.com> <20120416211912.GJ2852@adacore.com> <4F8CA3DB.3090005@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F8CA3DB.3090005@earthlink.net> (Stan Shebs's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:57:31 -0700") Message-ID: <87sjg2wopr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs writes: Joel> Perhaps we'll just want to fork away from top-level src, and have Joel> our own independent src (which, btw, would pave the way for a switch Joel> to a better VCS). It raises the problem of the synchronization Joel> with binutils, of course, but other than that, do we really need Joel> to have the same src as all the other projects? Do we really benefit Joel> from that? Stan> It *is* beneficial to get BFD checkins automatically. However, I Stan> think we'd be OK with a daily pull from a binutils repo, it's not Stan> often that a GDB change is revlocked to a BFD version. (And of course Stan> by "BFD" I also mean opcodes etc as well :-) ) I think Joseph Myers' migration plan is still the gold standard. In that one we would keep gdb and binutils in the same repository, recognizing that the projects share a lot of code. Tom