From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10593 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 19:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10579 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 19:05:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:04:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KJ4nCF000993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:04:49 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KJ4mkE003293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:04:48 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Matt Rice Cc: Siva Chandra , Doug Evans , Phil Muldoon , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included) References: <831unms3jy.fsf@gnu.org> <4F8F187D.3050402@redhat.com> <878vhsojgd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Matt Rice's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:43:55 -0700") Message-ID: <87sjfyi5rj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00696.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Rice writes: Matt> the following from (possibly outdated) symtab.c stuff is what i did Matt> find, i believe there is other uncommented occurrences, anyhow given Matt> the fudge and lack of errors I wouldn't be suprised to weirdness here Matt> go unnoticed. I've always assumed these comments are just wrong. If this can really happen, then the bug should be fixed in the symbol readers, not hacked around elsewhere. IMNSHO of course. Tom