From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14906 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 19:17:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 14898 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 19:17:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:16:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6JJGwj5027695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:16:58 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6JJGups030463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:16:57 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sigall.exp and friends: centralize signals list. References: <20120719143526.8328.28449.stgit@brno.lan> <87zk6vy88i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <500844E7.4040103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <500844E7.4040103@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:33:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87sjcny313.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> - We really want to skip the first signal, because that's Pedro> handled before the loop. It doesn't matter which signal it is. Pedro> So I concluded that not hard coding a signal name was a little Pedro> better, and went with a for with index, which expresses the idea Pedro> naturally. Alternatively you can use [lrange $signals 1 end] Tom