From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28314 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2012 18:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 28296 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2012 18:01:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:01:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8AI1alG029458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:01:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8AI1YZO012807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:01:35 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Yufeng Zhang , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Update help.exp References: <503DF8D2.8070807@arm.com> <871ui9eqhp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:41:07 -0700") Message-ID: <87sjapdaf5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> Can I suggest instead that we gut help.exp, and leave only a small set Doug> of tests for basic functionality, instead of testing the multitude of Doug> commands it currently tests? It is fine by me, but I'm not planning to do it. Tom