From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8744 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2012 17:40:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 8735 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2012 17:40:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:40:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8CHe6tG013584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:40:06 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CHe5mb024746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:40:05 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Oliver Buchtala Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patch for #14363 References: <501AA900.8020205@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <501AA900.8020205@googlemail.com> (Oliver Buchtala's message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:21:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87sjan5edm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Oliver" == Oliver Buchtala writes: Oliver> this patch can be used to achieve a workaround to bug Oliver> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14363 Besides Oliver> being a workaround, it also is a new feature, enabling a Oliver> pretty-printer to control the pretty-printing on deeper Oliver> recursion levels. I think I'd prefer some kind of "initialization" notification to the printers. This could just be an optional method that they implement. Tom