From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-101249-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29155 invoked by alias); 7 May 2013 18:08:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 29128 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2013 18:08:14 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:08:14 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r47I8A9G022862	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 7 May 2013 14:08:10 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-163.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.163])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r47I89xq021215	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Tue, 7 May 2013 14:08:09 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,        gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] not trigger pagination with dprintf
References: <CANFwon2V2vVADH89czoQjS+F=Uxsc5AgMAsQ3=d0nohc2EfBpA@mail.gmail.com>	<87zjwuv0qn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon1kWpR9mhGVbzf0qB4GqO89yN+Uj9jGUHpp2-kWWmFC4g@mail.gmail.com>	<87li87ll0r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon2jNppHObCEac=aSU6Uq6KLaoC5PGS8Vi3LawA+xzOJ=A@mail.gmail.com>	<87fvyd827o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon1m=hRBz22GLGa_CpWCYZ874K1P7mCEyYXHVc4T84U17A@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22Qz2tBWQmis=VbgXexNnYiqos2A1pBgeNN_NZtdQ=VtuQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CANFwon3HJye8SdLL8jV8H7-g-BipNON6+oS2p8J=QpnnrXbdFA@mail.gmail.com>	<83k3naeodd.fsf@gnu.org>	<CADPb22SD8H0HmopqHY7iFbFE+xFE2X092XgcBXeJ5CNm-W_Rgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:08:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22SD8H0HmopqHY7iFbFE+xFE2X092XgcBXeJ5CNm-W_Rgw@mail.gmail.com>	(Doug Evans's message of "Tue, 7 May 2013 10:01:23 -0700")
Message-ID: <87sj1yu0hj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:

Doug> I'm kinda on the fence, and I'd like to hear what other GMs think.

I still don't understand what is wrong with asking the user to disable
pagination if that is what is desired.  Maybe the user actually wants
pagination sometimes.

Tom