From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31092 invoked by alias); 24 May 2013 01:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31081 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2013 01:30:57 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_SM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 01:30:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4O1UopX003374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 May 2013 21:30:50 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-72.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.72]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4O1Unb0019968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 23 May 2013 21:30:50 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: asmwarrior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/40] use explicit returns to avoid checker confusion References: <27ac4476e9e4f7a238ca9f86ec955ef6d2d21c02.1368124285.git.tromey@redhat.com> <519EBAE8.9030909@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 01:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <519EBAE8.9030909@gmail.com> (asmwarrior@gmail.com's message of "Fri, 24 May 2013 08:57:12 +0800") Message-ID: <87sj1d9nau.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == ext asmwarrior writes: >> I see a compiler error: I think the patch series needs to be rebased. This function's got changed as part of the Python reference counting series. I'll fix it up and re-send modified patches soon, probably next week. Tom