From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28874 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2013 19:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28858 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2013 19:37:39 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:37:39 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8RJbb17000638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:37:37 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8RJbZFI022833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:37:36 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Record objfile->original_name as an absolute path References: <20130926084713.GA11031@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130926084713.GA11031@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:47:13 +0200") Message-ID: <87siwqcayo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00973.txt.bz2 Jan> Maybe that gdb_abspath should be rather done by the caller as there is also Jan> objfile = allocate_objfile (NULL, "<< JIT compiled code >>", 0); Jan> and calling gdb_abspath ("<< JIT compiled code >>") does not seem great. I've wanted an objfile flag for a while that would indicate whether the underlying BFD corresponds to a file or some other thing. Right now I think you can see lookups of bogusly-named files coming from the Python auto-loader. Tom