From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42535 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2019 18:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 42521 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2019 18:00:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:00:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BFB610F2402; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-196.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E09E5C686; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:00:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Alan Hayward Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Use gdbarch for probe::get_argument_count References: <20190821155816.45504-1-alan.hayward@arm.com> <20190821155816.45504-3-alan.hayward@arm.com> <87blw0t031.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87blw0t031.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Wed, 04 Sep 2019 13:58:42 -0400") Message-ID: <87sgpcrlfa.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, September 04 2019, I wrote: > On Wednesday, August 21 2019, Alan Hayward wrote: > >> The probe function get_argument_count does not need a frame, only >> the current gdbarch. Switch the code to pass gdbarch instead. >> No functional changes. > > The patch looks good at first glance, but I'd like to apply it before > approving. Unfortunately, it seems like your MUA has mangled the > message (which is strange, because apparently you're using > git-send-email): > > > > Can you resend it, please? Ah, I see that the whole patch series has already been pushed. Sorry, and please disregard my message. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/