From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 4OwKAGTHuWPhxhEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:26:28 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F0CDB1E222; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:26:27 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDA61E110 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:26:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFB93858414 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:26:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFB03858D39 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 19:26:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4DFB03858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend03.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.6.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nq9DR1dZ2z1r0mv; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:26:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan3.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.84]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nq9DR1CM4z1qqlR; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:26:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan3.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.84]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X36aGkQY1Y-x; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: YT0drm7VumrLwxRSCFwOFuHZWRKB0Ojjx1JekVkonTKKBP5Ss2Jc/FaEJpFMbUCE Received: from igel.home (aftr-62-216-205-97.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.205.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48FD32C13B2; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0w6uaad.fsf@gnu.org> <87fscmemeo.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83358mu1tv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bknaek9z.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83v8lisjlx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lemeh4wz.fsf@igel.home> <83h6x2sb5x.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz7qh2db.fsf@igel.home> <83a62usabj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rieh194.fsf@igel.home> <838ries9je.fsf@gnu.org> <874jt2h0hq.fsf@igel.home> <835ydis7qt.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgaufj4w.fsf@igel.home> <83zgauqqa5.fsf@gnu.org> <1151933072.13100631.1673108176724@mail.yahoo.com> <87mt6ufdle.fsf@igel.home> <83tu12qkt4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a62ufbf2.fsf@igel.home> <83r0w6qjf4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Yow: How do I get HOME? Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:26:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83r0w6qjf4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2023 20:38:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87sfgmdu3t.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 19:26:57 +0100 >> >> On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> From: Andreas Schwab >> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" >> >> >> >> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 18:39:57 +0100 >> >> >> >> On Jan 07 2023, Hannes Domani wrote: >> >> >> >> > Isn't --enable-shared the default? >> >> >> >> No. >> > >> > gdb/libtool thinks shared libraries should be built: >> >> bfd/libtool and opcodes/libtool don't. > > But the issue at hand is about what happens in gdb/, not in bfd or > opcodes. Only bfd and opcodes build possibly shared libraries, and only that will have an affect on the necessity to build a gdb libtool wrapper. >> As you already discovered, gdb/libtool is not used for building >> libraries at all. > > So you are saying it's a bug in gdb/configure? No. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."