From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23758 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23751 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:21:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:21:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1OFLlb11929 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:21:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (vpnuser8.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.8]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1OFLki09611; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:21:46 -0500 Received: from rsandifo by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AveNq-0000f5-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:22:06 +0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com Subject: Re: Write-after-approval access References: <87ekskona1.fsf@redhat.com> <403B6B4D.5080300@gnu.org> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <403B6B4D.5080300@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:18:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87r7wkzen5.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00676.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > FYI: > Write After Approval > (alphabetic) > > To get recommended for the Write After Approval list you need a valid > FSF assignment and have submitted one good patch. OK, thanks. Sorry for not seeing that. I've had changes to sim/mips accepted in the past, does that qualify? Richard