From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7820 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2012 17:37:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7810 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2012 17:37:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:37:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q73HbeDX020871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:37:40 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q73HbdQJ014327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:37:40 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] test case References: <1343992904-9375-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1343992904-9375-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1343992904-9375-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:21:44 +0800") Message-ID: <87r4rnnafw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> * gdb.mi/mi-cmd-param-changed.exp: New. Yao> * gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp: Update for MI notification "=cmd-param-changed". Yao> * gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp, gdb.mi/mi2-cli.exp: Likewise. Yao> * gdb.mi/mi2-prompt.exp: Likewise. This looks good but I did not see a test for abbreviated multi-word commands, and I think that would be a useful addition. Tom