From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10021 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 16:27:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9953 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 16:27:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:27:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qACGRCLk027048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:27:12 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qACGRAoX001065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:27:11 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pierre Muller , "'Andreas Schwab'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA-v2] ARI fixes: Remove some sprintf calls References: <4297.05661158568$1352387430@news.gmane.org> <87d2znhj7t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <000001cdc061$dad58740$908095c0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20121112160741.GT5103@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121112160741.GT5103@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:07:41 -0800") Message-ID: <87r4nybxcx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> I'm wondering if there is any way to provoke an error if we ever Joel> use sprintf again... I am asking because I know that it's easy to Joel> ignore the ARI. I kind of remember not being able to do that, but Joel> perhaps wrong memory. #poison, maybe? If all uses are removed we could probably use #pragma GCC poison in defs.h. Tom