From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28564 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 16:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 28541 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2012 16:33:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:33:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADGWxMw028763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:59 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qADGWweG030184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:58 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Stephane Carrez Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix gdb's prompt for continue in TUI SingleKey mode References: <874nkuddwl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Stephane Carrez's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:36:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87r4nx8nut.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Stephane" == Stephane Carrez writes: Stephane> The problem is that the TUI must know that a gdb command is Stephane> being executed. This way, if it interacts with the user, it Stephane> has to be in the mode where a prompt is displayed. Stephane> If we add some boolean predicate function that tells us we are Stephane> executing some command (whatever the command, a user, a set, a Stephane> show, ...) this would be fine for me. Some kind of Stephane> 'is_executing_command_p'. Something like this would be fine by me. Tom