From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1053 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2013 20:59:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1037 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2013 20:59:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:59:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r03KxQdo022498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:59:26 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r03KxOne014744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:59:25 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA] Avoid calling stat with empty name in relocate_gdb_directory References: <29503.7594777115$1354726985@news.gmane.org> <87sj7ks7g6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <434.327257289802$1354751122@news.gmane.org> <87d2ynxc6t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <26262.2907328934$1355473042@news.gmane.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <26262.2907328934$1355473042@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:16:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87r4m20yqb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> I still think that the approach of testing if *dir == '\0' Pierre> is safer... That is ok by me. Tom