[obv] Fix new FAIL on 64-bit targets [Re: [PATCH 1/3] Test of breakpoint output for dprintf]

Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-11T15:22:13Z

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:53:01 +0100, Yao Qi wrote:
> * gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints'
> for dprintf.
> * gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp (test_insert_delete_modify):
> Check the fields in "=breakpoint-created" for dprintf.

It has FAIL on 64-bit targets:

gdb_expect_list pattern: /[^M
]Num Type Disp Enb Address What/
info breakpoints^M
Num Type Disp Enb Address What^M
2 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000400743 in main at ./gdb.base/dprintf.c:33^M
[...]
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 1 (pattern 1)

Checked in as obvious.

Thanks,
Jan

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-01/msg00059.html

--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2013/01/11 00:31:56 1.3500
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2013/01/11 15:21:13 1.3501
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-01-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.base/dprintf.exp (dprintf info 1): Fix expectation on 64-bit
+ targets.
+
2013-01-11 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>

* gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints'
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2013/01/11 00:31:58 1.7
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2013/01/11 15:21:14 1.8
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
"Dprintf .*"

gdb_test_sequence "info breakpoints" "dprintf info 1" {
- "\[\r\n\]Num Type Disp Enb Address What"
+ "\[\r\n\]Num Type Disp Enb Address +What"
"\[\r\n\]2 breakpoint"
"\[\r\n\]3 dprintf"
"\[\r\n\] printf \"At foo entry\\\\n\""