From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3448 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2013 18:57:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 3423 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2013 18:57:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:57:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0LIvXws010378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:57:33 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0LIvVtZ028746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:57:32 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] TUI: Use internally fullname References: <20130117215935.GE16249@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130117215935.GE16249@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:59:35 +0100") Message-ID: <87r4le1i04.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> TUI was using comp_dir-relative "filaname" during matching. Looks good to me. Jan> - && (filename_cmp (src->filename, loc->symtab->filename) == 0) Jan> + && filename_cmp (src->fullname, Jan> + symtab_to_fullname (loc->symtab)) == 0 After your patches is it ever ok to refer directly to symtab->filename? Tom