From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3884 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2013 17:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3874 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2013 17:27:56 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:27:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3THRibY008360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:27:44 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3THRh6b017198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:27:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Tedeschi\, Walfred" Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description. References: <1366812163-27865-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <87wqrrn7ki.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvyek9ec.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Walfred Tedeschi's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:59:20 +0000") Message-ID: <87r4htz1ps.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Walfred" == Tedeschi, Walfred writes: Walfred> Thanks for this clarification. Since it's not checked-in yet, Walfred> I think it would make sense using the usual xml header, or? Walfred> (Keeping all xml files homogeneous) Yeah, I think it is fine to change it back. Sorry about that. Tom